News

Labor Law Violators Still Get Contracts

A study released by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) shows that 60% of  the top 50 violators of labor laws from 2005 to 2009 still received federal contracts in 2009. These companies receive billions in contracts despite numerous Safety, occupational and wage violations as well as facing discrimination charges. It was also discovered that nearly 40% of the 50 largest fines leveled by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) between 2005 and 2009 were against companies that still gained contracts in 2009. This group of violators has also been found to be cited by both the Wage and Hour Division (WHD) and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

The specific code being violated by handing out huge contracts to such gross offenders would be Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 9.104-1 which states that “a satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics” is part of the general standards of responsibility. The Project ON Government Oversight (POGO) possesses a database that catalogues 200 cases of labor misconduct resulting in $1.4 billion in penalties, settlements, judgments and fines.

15 companies cited for labor law violations by either OSHA, NLRB or WHD were reviewed by the GAO. The GAO only looked at instances of substantial fines- assessments of at least $100,000 by WHD and OSHA fines of at least $25,000. These 15 companies were awarded over $6 billion in contracts during the previous fiscal year. Some of the major labor law violators include: Corrections Corporation of America, Tyson Foods, Akal Security, Inc. and Teco-Westinghouse Motor Company. Compounding the problem is the fact that 7 of the 15 companies reviewed committed other violations. These actions included defrauding Medicare and Medicaid, hiring undocumented workers and violating environmental laws.

The GAO report indicates that poor intra-government information sharing is putting workers at risk. Data about violations is scattered about some areas while relevant data about awarded contracts exists in other locations. Connecting the two was even difficult for the GAO and they could only find data on the top 50 violators leaving a question as to how far reaching the problem may be.

The White House is aware of the problem and appears to be taking strides to address the issues. Vice President Joe Biden is developing a “High Road” contracting policy. This proposal centers on wages and benefits but critics note it does not currently address other problems such as tax cheats, polluters or safety and health violators.

Sources:


http://www.ombwatch.org/node/11317

http://pogoblog.typepad.com/pogo/2010/10/are-federal-contractors-a-bunch-of-scrooges.html

http://www.federaltimes.com/article/20101005/ACQUISITION03/10050303/

http://www.allgov.com/Where_is_the_Money_Going/ViewNews/Contractors_with_Labor_Law_Violations_Won_6_Billion_Dollars_in_Contracts_Last_Year_101006

 

EEOC sues US Steel

The federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission announced on Oct. 5 that it had filed a lawsuit against US Steel Corp. for violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by instituting nationwide random alcohol tests for probationary employees and then firing some employees based on those tests.

Civil Action 2:10-cv-01284 was filed in U.S. District in Western District of Pennsylvania and alleges that the ADA was violated because US Steel administered medical tests. Under the ADA an employer can generally only require a medical exam like an alcohol test if the employer has reason to believe that the employee will not be able to perform a job safely or successfully because of a medical condition. Exams may also be done to check for conditions if an employee requests accommodation for medical reasons.

The suit most specifically pertains to a situation in the Clairton, PA facility involving Abigail DeSimone. DeSimone was subjected to a random alcohol test and failed because of a medical condition. She advised the nurse of that the test may be a false positive because of diabetes. The nurse refused a request for an alternative test so DeSimone had a blood alcohol test done by her physician who then faxed the test results to US Steel at the companies request. Even though the blood alcohol test came out negative DeSimone was fired anyways.

US Steel has been performing these alcohol tests in violation of the ADA since 2006 according to the EEOC. There has been an attempt at pre-litigation settlement before filing suit and the EEOC seeks monetary damages for DeSimone and other employees as well as a cessation of the ADA violating random medical tests.

A statement was released by Regional Attorney Debra Lawrence of the EEOC’s Philadelphia District Office, “An employer can only require an employee to submit to a medical examination such as an alcohol test if the examination is job-related and consistent with business necessity. The EEOC is committed to eradicating systemic discrimination in the workplace, including blanket policies mandating medical examinations that violate federal law.”

It should be noted that in the fiscal year 2009 there was a record 21,451 disability discrimination charges in the United States.

Sources:

"EEOC sues U.S. Steel for disability discrimination"  http://www.reliableplant.com/Read/26879/EEOC-US-Steel-discrimination

"EEOC sues U.S. Steel, USW over test"  http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/business/s_702918.html
"AP: US Steel sued over probationary alcohol tests"  http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ixR70rAg4HhbtenzeWx74WEfKs6gD9IJ4AL80?docId=D9IJ4AL80

   

Contact Us

Banner

Employment Statistics

  • Current Employment Statistics Latest Numbers

    Change in Total Nonfarm Payroll Employment:
    +165,000(p) in Apr 2013
    Historical Data

    Change in Total Private Average Hourly Earnings for All Employees:
    +$0.04(p) in Apr 2013
    Historical Data

    Change in Total Private Average Weekly Hours for All Employees:
    -0.2(p) in Apr 2013
    Historical Data

    Percent change in Total Private Aggregate Weekly Hours for All Employees:
    -0.4%(p) in Apr 2013
    Historical Data

    Change in Manufacturing Average Weekly Hours for All Employees:
    -0.1(p) in Apr 2013
    Historical Data

    Change in Manufacturing Average Weekly Overtime for All Employees:
    -0.1(p) in Apr 2013
    Historical Data

    Change in Total Private Real Average Hourly Earnings for All Employees:
    +$0.05(p) in Apr 2013
    Historical Data

    p- preliminary

Connect

  • Facebook Page: 104680559586800
  • Flickr: UnfairWorkplace
  • Google Reader: user%2F04155647633683198020%2Flabel%2Fshared
  • Twitter: UnfairWorkplace

Contact Us

Give us a call at 1-800-680-3605